Blue Hawaiian shirt
Evidence
Segment hashes
Listing Match
PHOTO 1
Show more match frames
Condition Observations
Large tear/hole at right underarm seam junction — fabric is torn through with frayed edges, approximately 2–3 cm in diameter, clearly a structural failure at a high-stress point
Show 1 more frame
Hole above left chest pocket area — fabric torn through with frayed/ragged edges, approximately 1–2 cm, located at a seam or stress point near the pocket
Show 1 more frame
Additional hole/tear visible at what appears to be a side seam or pocket seam on the body — small but clearly open with frayed threads visible
Show 1 more frame
Visible discoloration/staining in the right underarm region — brownish-tan tonal shift consistent with perspiration staining, visible in underarm frames
Show 1 more frame
Visible discoloration/staining in the left underarm region — similar brownish tonal shift visible in underarm frames
Show 1 more frame
General wrinkling/creasing throughout the garment — consistent with storage rather than structural fabric degradation; no thinning or threadbare areas detected
Show 2 more frames
Claims Assessment
| Claim | Observation | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Condition: Worn, some damage | Multiple structural holes/tears detected at right underarm and left chest area, plus additional damage at a side seam/pocket area; garment shows signs of wear including underarm discoloration. Claim is consistent with observed condition. | consistent |
| Tear on right underarm | A clearly visible large tear with frayed edges is observed at the right underarm seam junction in FRAME_10 and FRAME_11, approximately 2–3 cm in diameter. | consistent |
| Hole above left chest pocket | A hole with frayed/ragged edges is visible in FRAME_13 and FRAME_14 in the left chest/armhole area. The exact location relative to the pocket is consistent with the claim. | consistent |
| Size XXL | Tag in FRAME_1 and FRAME_2 clearly reads 'XXL/EEG', consistent with stated size. | consistent |
| Blue Hawaiian shirt | Item is a light blue short-sleeve button-up shirt with a tropical leaf and floral Hawaiian print, consistent with the title description. | consistent |
Coverage & Limitations
- —Tag & collar
- —Full front
- —Left cuff
- —Right cuff
- —Left underarm
- —Right underarm
- —Full back
- —The Tear on right underarm you mentioned
- —The Hole above left chest pocket you mentioned
None recorded.
Lighting is generally adequate across frames; some frames (FRAME_8, FRAME_9) show slight motion blur and backlighting that makes underarm stain assessment approximate. Close-up flaw frames (FRAME_10, FRAME_11, FRAME_13, FRAME_14, FRAME_15, FRAME_16) are well-lit and clearly show damage details.
- —Interior lining and facing not shown in any frame; condition of interior seams cannot be fully assessed.
- —Bottom hem was not captured in close-up; hem condition is only partially visible in overview frames.
- —Underarm stain assessment is medium confidence due to backlighting and motion in FRAME_8 and FRAME_9.
- —The exact size of the hole in FRAME_15/FRAME_16 (side seam/pocket area) is difficult to measure precisely from the available angle.
- —No measurements provided by seller; dimensional claims are not_assessable in this system.
- —Chest pocket interior not shown; pocket condition cannot be assessed.
Methodology
This report presents observations from an in-app guided capture analyzed against listing photos under rubric garments-v1. Video was recorded per-angle on the seller's device using the guided capture flow; frames were extracted per segment for analysis. Condition scores are generated by an AI vision model at temperature 0 with a fixed rubric. The tier label is computed deterministically from axis scores. Timestamps are app-controlled, not cryptographically attested. The device clock is stored but labeled self-reported.
This is not an origin determination, not a professional appraisal, and does not constitute any form of warranty. The system observes visual evidence only and cannot detect issues not visible in the submitted media.
Video capture time, if shown, is self-reported by the seller. This system does not independently verify when the video was recorded.